Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 15, 1974PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

Defendant was convicted of rape and appeals on three grounds.

I

First, defendant argues that he was denied pretrial discovery in violation of Superior Court Criminal Rule 16, 1 Del.C.Ann.

Prior to trial, defendant requested “written or recorded (in any form whatsoever) statements or confessions” made by defendant; the State answered by saying that none existed. At trial, however, testimony indicated that defendant had made certain incriminating statements to his father who subsequently related them to the police. Sometime thereafter a police memorandum was made, paraphrasing the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  5. The PEOPLE v. MarinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wiley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API