Legal Opinion

Parrish v. LAYTON CITY CORPORATION

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1975No. 14018PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice: '

Plaintiff initiated this action to obtain damages and injunctive relief for the flooding of his property situated in Layton, Utah. In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that he had filed a verified claim with defendant on July 26, 1973, and that part of the damages he had sustained were incurred within 90 days immediately preceding the filing of his claim. Plaintiff pleaded that defendant had denied his claim; that the condition causing damages to his property still existed; and that his property remained in peril of further damage from flooding.

In his first claim, plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanford v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dahl v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsUtah Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ringwood v. Foreign Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Stevensen v. GoodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lovendahl v. Jordan School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Provo City Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API