National Ass'n of Telecommunications Officers & Advisors v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge:
In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission reversed a decades-old, rebut-table presumption that determined whether state and local franchising authorities may regulate cable rates. Concerning Effective Competition; Implementation of Section 111 of the STELA Reauthorization Act, 80 Fed. Reg. 38001 (2015) (the Order) (to be codified at 47 C.F.R. pt. 76). The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, the National Association of Broadcasters, and the Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission petition for review of the Order…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ma. Dept. of Telecomm & Cable v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- (PC) Vasquez v. MaybergDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Baffert v. WunderlerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- DotC United, Inc. v. Google Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Guanzon v. Vixxo CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.