Baffert v. Wunderler

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOB BAFFERT, et al., Case No.: 23-cv-1774-RSH-BLM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 13 v. DICORCIA’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 14 JUSTIN A. WUNDERLER and DANIEL DICORCIA, 15 [ECF No. 55] Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is a motion for attorney’s fees filed by defendant Daniel DiCorcia 20 (“DiCorcia”). ECF No. 55. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1) the Court finds the 21 motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons 22 below, the Court denies the motion.…