Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Federal Outfitting Co., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1933No. Docket No. 8890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings after the impaneling of a jury and from an order dismissing the action without leave to amend, upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint comprises two causes of. action: one sounding in libel for the special damages alleged therein, for general damages and also for punitive damages for malice; the second for damages for the negligence of defendants in committing the acts complained of. A demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint was interposed, argued and overruled. At…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Morasse v. BrochuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Tanforan v. TanforanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Summers v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Jarboe Livestock Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. Abramowitz v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API