Legal Opinion
City of Kingston v. Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenneth S. MacAffer, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff for an order pendente lite ‘ ‘ restraining the defendant Sam Bank from doing plumbing work within the City of Kingston and specifically in connection with the construction of the Mary’s Avenue School, and restraining the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Kingston from contracting with or employing any person or firm not having a Certificate of Competency to do any plumbing work in any of the schools in the City of Kingston.” The motion was returnable at the above Special Term and was referred to me by the Justice presiding thereat.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- City of Utica v. OrtnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- City of New York v. Windsor Madison Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Gilbert v. GermanNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Poughkeepsie v. Hopper Plumbing & Heating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Town of Poughkeepsie v. Hopper Plumbing & Heating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- R. G. H. Plumbing, Inc. v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1972