Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Windsor Madison Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

The plaintiff, the City of New York, instituted this action to restrain permanently the defendants from selling or offering to sell to the public goods and merchandise by advertising or otherwise in such manner as to reasonably convey to the public that upon the disposal of the stock on hand the business would close absolutely and finally.

Service of process was effectuated upon the corporate defendant, and not upon the individual defendants.

The record discloses that the corporate defendant (hereinafter called “defendant”), conducted a retail men’s haberdashers'" on Madison Avenue, New York…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Windsor Madison Corp. v. O'ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Kingston v. BankNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Town of Poughkeepsie v. Hopper Plumbing & Heating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API