Legal Opinion
City of Utica v. Ortner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for temporary injunction granted and motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with ten dollars costs. Memorandum: The common council of the city of Utica had authority to enact the Zoning Ordinance in question here and the city of Utica was authorized to maintain an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to compel compliance with or to restrain by injunction the violation thereof, notwithstanding the fact that a penalty was provided therein for its violation. (Second Class Cities Law, art. 4, §§ 30, 42; General City Law,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bond v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Village of Northport v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Incorporated Village of Northport v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of New York v. Bilynn Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Town of East Hampton v. BuffaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Town of Oyster Bay v. SodomskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- City of New York v. CincottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- City of Albany v. McMorranNew York Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.