Legal Opinion

Town of Poughkeepsie v. Hopper Plumbing & Heating Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Hawkins, J.

Plaintiff, the Town of Poughkeepsie, moves for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the defendant, Hopper Plumbing and Heating Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Hopper”) from completing its plumbing contract on the Sheafe Road School and from commencing work on the Hagantown Elementary School. Joined as parties defendants are the Central School District No. 1 and the Union Free School District No. 2. The prayer for injunctive relief is predicated upon the failure and refusal of the defendant Hopper to obtain plumbing licenses and permits from the Town of Poughkeepsie where the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Cranford v. . Tyrrell.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Davis v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. City of Utica v. OrtnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Poughkeepsie v. Hopper Plumbing & Heating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API