Legal Opinion

MILLER AND CO. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 24, 1986No. 84-4-00576PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This action challenges a determination upon the annual review of a countervailing duty order regarding Brazilian pig iron. The year under review was 1981. In this court’s previous opinion in this matter, Miller and Co. v. United States, 8 CIT 281, 598 F.Supp. 1126 (1984), this court determined that no jurisdiction existed for an action under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1982) inasmuch as plaintiff did not participate in the underlying administrative proceedings. See 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(A) (1982) (participation made a prerequisite to suit). The only possible jurisdictional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ambassador Division of Florsheim Shoe v. The United States, and Footwear Industries of America, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. American Permac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. UST, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  5. Miller and Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Omni U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Miller & Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API