Legal Opinion
Leake v. City of Venice
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1920No. Civ. No. 3108PublishedCited by 13 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In each of these cases the complaint alleged that Thomas W. Prior, Thornton Kinney, Chauncey Pettis, J. R. Pones, P. A. Church, W. A. Rennie, Byron Palmer, and Charles W. Shaw did associate themselves under the fictitious name of Venice Road Race Association, for the purpose of promoting and conducting an automobile road race over the highways in the city of Venice; and that in preparing. the highways and roads for said race and in the conduct of the same, plaintiffs and their assignors, at the special instance and request of defendants, with whom the city of Venice was joined as defendant,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. KeelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Willcox v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Vader v. BallouWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Crawley v. American Society of Equity of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Winona Lumber Co. v. ChurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Security-First National Bank v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Burrell v. Capt. H. A. Crow Post No. 884California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Nowell v. OswaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.