In re Coursen's Estate
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. V. Coffey, Judge. Appeal by William P. Stout from a decree allowing the account of G. A. Coursen as an executor of the will of Jeanie A. Coursen, deceased, and disallowing the account of appellant as coexecutor, and from a decree of distribution of her estate. Decree settling accounts affirmed, and decree distributing the estate reversed.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Jeanie A. Coursen died testate in 1877, naming William P. Stout and G. A. Coursen as executors, and her will was shortly after duly probated, and letters issued to the executors. An inventory was filed and notice to creditors published. No claims have been presented *758against the estate. The property consisted of $180 in money and certain real property on Fulton street, in San Francisco, which was occupied hy the family of deceased. Respondent Coursen was the second husband of deceased, and appellant, Stout, was her son by her first husband. She left seven children of the second…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bates v. RybergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Commercial Bank of San Luis Obispo v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In the Matter of Estate of SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Clay v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rice v. TiltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Anderson v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Warren's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Middlecoff v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Inman v. IrvingArizona Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.