Legal Opinion

Carillo v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1987No. EAB 85-AB-1632; CA A38157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*206BUTTLER, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Employment Appeals Board determining that she is not entitled to unemployment benefits because she does not have an immigrant visa or work authorization from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and is, therefore, “unavailable” for work. We reverse.

Petitioner entered the United States from Mexico in 1975. She did not have any type of visa. She was employed in Hermiston by the J.R. Simplot Company from June, 1978, until June, 1984, when she was discharged, pursuant to a new company policy, because she could not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Duenas-Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Gillar v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Vespremi v. GilesOhio Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Landa v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Carillo v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Landa v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. McMillin v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API