Legal Opinion

Gillar v. Employment Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1986No. EAB 84-AB-1420; CA A33953; SC S32038PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The issue in this case is whether claimant is entitled to receive unemployment compensation under ORS 657.184 which provides:

“Benefits shall not be paid on the basis of services performed by an alien unless such alien is an individual who has been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence or to perform such services, or otherwise is permanently residing in the United States under color of law, including an alien who is lawfully present in the United States as a result of the application of the provisions of section 203(a)(7) or section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Salem College & Academy, Inc. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Page v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jimoh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Brambila v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Industrial Commission v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Division of Employment & Training v. TurynskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API