Legal Opinion
Carillo v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 12, 1987No. EAB 85-AB-1632; CA A38157Published
1Opinion of the Court
744 P.2d 1304 (1987)
88 Or.App. 204
Petra R. CARILLO, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
EAB 85-AB-1632; CA A38157.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted September 8, 1986.
Decided November 12, 1987.
D. Michael Dale, Ontario, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Peter Fels, Oregon Legal Services Corp., Pendleton.
Christine Chute, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.
BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.
Petition…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Duenas-Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Alonso v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.