Legal Opinion

Buttrill v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1947No. 32298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendants in error instituted this action against plaintiffs in error to judicially establish and quiet their title to an implied easement for passageway over land owned by the defendants. Plaintiffs were awai'ded judgment, and it is therefrom defendants appeal.

For reversal it is urged (1) the court erred in the admission of testimony, and (2) that the findings and judgment of the court are contrary to the law and the evidence.

The premises involved are lots 12 and 13 of the Capitol Courts Addition to Oklahoma City, which are contiguous, and an unplatted area that adjoins said lot 12. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curry v. Southwall CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Waken v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Head v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gorman v. OvermyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. EQ OKLAHOMA, INC. v. A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. White v. GraceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API