Legal Opinion

State v. . Ham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1944PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants were convicted of robbery of one Ardella Evans committed on the first day of October, 1943. With the appellants Ernest Evans was charged in the bill of indictment, but in the course of the trial the solicitor for the State took a nol. pros. as to him.

From judgment of imprisonment predicated upon a jury verdict of guilty of robbery the defendants William Davis (alias Jack) Ham, Thurman Hardy and Raymond Hardy appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning errors. The first exceptive assignments of error set out in the appellants' brief are those numbered one and two and are to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . SmoakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API