Legal Opinion

People v. Keith C.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2015No. A141529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STREETER, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a juvenile court, having ordered 15-year-old ward Keith C. to pay victim restitution, had authority to enter an abstract of judgment restating the restitution order upon termination of Keith’s wardship, more than two years after he turned 21. We hold that it was authorized to do so, and thus affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In February 2006, the Alameda County District Attorney filed a wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, 1 § 602) alleging Keith, then 15 years old, unlawfully took and drove a Toyota van owned by Kenneth Thomas (Veh. Code, §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dowling v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. People v. Brittany L.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. R.V.California Court of Appeal · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. J.G.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. In re J.H.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re J.H.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API