Legal Opinion
Torre v. Federated Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 4, 1995No. Civ. A. 91-4235-DESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pamela Torre brought the instant action alleging the following: (1) sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (2) various violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”); (3) discrimination in violation of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 62A; (4) breach of employment contract; (5) intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (6) tortious interference with prospective business advantage. The parties moved for summary judgment. The court issued a Memorandum and Order, filed…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chambers v. Family Health Plan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Herring v. Oak Park BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Deavenport v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Godinet v. Management & Training Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Torre v. Federated Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997