Legal Opinion
Herring v. Oak Park Bank
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 9, 1997No. 95-2623PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
By this action, plaintiff alleges that defendants terminated his employment for the purpose of interfering with his rights under his “phantom stock” plan, in violation of section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. Plaintiff has also brought a common law civil conspiracy claim, alleging that the individual defendants conspired to violate section 510. The matter is presently before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 52) and defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s demand for a jury…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mazer v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Donovan v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
- Nadworny v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Emery v. Bay Capital Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Peruvian Connection, Ltd. v. ChristianDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.