Deavenport v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant, MCI Telecommunications Corporation (MCI), moves for partial summary judgment on plaintiffs claim that MCI retaliated against her for complaining of sexual harassment and on her claim for back pay damages. MCI argues that plaintiff, Kathleen G. Deavenport (Deavenport), cannot maintain a retaliation claim because none of the allegedly retaliatory acts of which she complains constitute an “ultimate employment decision.” MCI further argues that Deavenport cannot recover back pay for any of her claims because she has been on disability…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jean G. Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Chemical Company, D/B/A Texas Eastman CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saylor v. RidgeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Phair v. New Page Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2010