Legal Opinion

LeMaire v. Maass

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 31, 1990No. CV 89-382-PAPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PANNER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Samuel LeMaire, an inmate at Oregon State Penitentiary (OSP), brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendant Manfred Maass, the OSP Superintendent. He seeks injunc-tive relief from allegedly unconstitutional conditions of his imprisonment in the Disciplinary Segregation Unit (DSU) at OSP. I toured the DSU and conducted a court trial at OSP. These are my findings of fact and conclusions of law under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

Plaintiff brings two claims, an eighth amendment claim for cruel and unusual punishment, and a fourteenth…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Rex Chappell v. R. MandevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Tafari v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  4. Walker v. WoodfordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
  5. Neil Grenning v. Maggie Miller-StoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API