Legal Opinion

Walker v. Woodford

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 12, 2006No. 05CV1705-LAB (NLS)PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED, DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, STRIKING CERTAIN EXHIBITS, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

BURNS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs K. Jamel Walker and Dale Hurd, inmates at Calipatria State Prison (“Calipatria”), filed a complaint in this case on August 30, 2005, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of their Eighth Amendment rights. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  2. Victoria v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  3. Cameron v. MyersDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
  4. Botelho v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Hurd v. GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API