Legal Opinion

Neil Grenning v. Maggie Miller-Stout

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2014No. 11-35579PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Neil Grenning appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials. Grenning contends that continuous twenty-four-hour illumination of his cell violated the Eighth Amendment. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. Background

Neil Grenning is a Washington State inmate at Airway Heights Corrections Center (“Airway Heights”). Prison staff placed Grenning in the Special Management Unit (“SMU”) of Airway Heights “pending investigation” into a fight “that he was allegedly involved in.” Grenning was kept in the SMU for about thirteen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Thomas Porter v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. Robert Wilk v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Jorge Rico v. Clark DucartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. ScherfWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Coleman v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API