Finn v. City of Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
Appellant, Mary Finn, was awarded a judgment in the amount of $203,500 against appellee, City of Philadelphia, after appellant was injured when she fell on a grease-covered city sidewalk. The Commonwealth Court reversed the judgment due to governmental immunity under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8541-8564, holding that the “sidewalk exception,” 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b)(7), did not pierce the city’s immunity in this case. We granted allocatur to clarify precedents of this court relating to immunity, and to construe the language of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Grieff v. ReisingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Kilgore v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Williams v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Page v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.