Legal Opinion

Finn v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1995PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

Appellant, Mary Finn, was awarded a judgment in the amount of $203,500 against appellee, City of Philadelphia, after appellant was injured when she fell on a grease-covered city sidewalk. The Commonwealth Court reversed the judgment due to governmental immunity under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8541-8564, holding that the “sidewalk exception,” 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b)(7), did not pierce the city’s immunity in this case. We granted allocatur to clarify precedents of this court relating to immunity, and to construe the language of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Grieff v. ReisingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Kilgore v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Williams v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Page v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API