Legal Opinion

Gadd v. Olson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1984No. 18876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

York and Rose Olson, defendants and third-party plaintiffs herein, appeal from a summary judgment that dismissed their third-party action against Mark Johnson for fraud.

Prior to April 8, 1981, the Olsons (hereinafter “appellants”) were in default in the payment of their obligations under a trust deed note and trust deed on their house. To avoid losing the house through foreclosure, appellants accepted an offer of financial assistance from Mark Johnson (hereinafter “respondent”). On April 8, a transaction conceived by respondent was effected between the parties (i.e.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. White v. HarriganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Berry v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Stegman v. Professional & Business Men's Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Briggs v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. GAF Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Cox v. Utah Mortg. and Loan Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. England Logistics v. Kelles Transport ServiceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API