Brandenstein v. Hoke
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Garoutte, J.—
The defendants, other than George L. Brander, an intervener, are the supervisors of the county of Sutter, and, as such, are ex officio members of and constitute the board of reclamation fund commissioners of levee district No. 5. The plaintiff is the holder of certain bonds of said district which were issued and sold for the purpose of securing funds to carry on improvements in such levee district. A writ of mandate is prayed for, requiring said board of fund commissioners to- take certain steps provided in the statute looking toward the levy and collection of a tax upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- People ex rel. Shumway v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Sutro v. PettitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Moulton v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by25 opinions
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.