Legal Opinion

Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1944No. 29667PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The sole question here is whether the real property of the appellant is entitled to exemption, from taxation, under favor of Section 5351, General Code, on the ground that it is public property used for a public purpose.

A brief statement of the authority under which the appellant was organized and of its authority to hold and operate, and its method of operating, the properties in question will be helpful in giving answer to this question. The Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority was organized in 1934 pursuant to the Ohio Housing Authority Law (Sections 1078-29 to 1078-41, inclusive, General…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Philada Home Fund v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Board of Education of City School District v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API