Legal Opinion

Cullitan v. Cunningham Sanitarium

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1938No. 26552PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The only question at issue in this case is whether the property known and referred to as The Cunningham Sanitarium falls within the class of property authorized by Section 2, Article XII of the Constitution, to be exempted from taxation. Is it an institution “used exclusively for charitable purposes”? Pursuant to such constitutional authority, Section 5353, General Code, was enacted and it was thus provided that “* * * property belonging to institutions used exclusively for charitable purposes, shall be exempt from taxation.” There is no presumption favorable to exemption from taxation. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bistline v. BassettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Stanton v. Frankel Bros. Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Boss v. HessOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re Complaint of TaxpayersOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority v. ThatcherOhio Supreme Court · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API