Anderson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
It is to be regretted that some of the gentlemen of the bar in preparing appeals to this Court, are unmindful of the provisions of Rule 4 of this Court. That rule provides that: “When it is necessary to print the testimon)'", or any part thereof, the same shall be printed in question and answer form, etc. ‘ * * * Only the necessary and pertinent testimony to which one or more exceptions relate shall he printed,” etc. (Italics added.)
Some attorneys seem to think the rule gives them authority to print all of the testimony whether or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Livingstain v. Columbian Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Peurifoy, Receiver v. Gamble, ReceiverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Beatty v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Lowry v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- In Re. American Slicing Machine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.