Legal Opinion

Beatty v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 1925No. 11761PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

Action by an heir at law and distributee against the surety upon an administration bond.

The pertinent facts are as follows: J. C. Carsten died intestate in Florence County in 1902, leaving as his only heirs at law and distributees his father, C. G. Carsten, three brothers, C. C. Cartsen, E. H. Carsten, and Robert Carsten, and the plaintiff herein, the only child of a predeceased sister. At this time plaintiff was about 5 years old. On January 9, 1903, C. G. Carsten, the father of the intestate, was appointed administrator by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Epperson v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. Lowry v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  3. Duke v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Bradford v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Hodge v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Connell v. ConnellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Beckwith v. McAlisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Cottingham v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API