Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co., Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
Plaintiffs, children of William S. Norton, are his sole survivors. They allege that the sajd Norton died as the result of an accident, legal responsibility for which rests upon de-” fendant.
Since Norton’s death was not instantaneous, and since he suffered considerable pain and mental anguish, his survivors, if there is liability in defendant, were entitled to recover, not only the amount which he himself, had he lived, could have recovered as a recompense for his pain and suffering, but also for the direct loss of companionship, affection, and support which each survivor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Reed v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Eichorn v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Blank v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Continental Supply Co. v. AbellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933