Legal Opinion

Concannon v. Noble

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1884No. 10,694PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Laporte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

An action was brought by the appellee against the appellants and George Sykes, and a judgment was rendered against all of the defendants in that action. The ■complaint in the present case seeks a review of that judgment, and the suit is prosecuted by the appellants alone. Their co-defendant in the former action is not made a party .to the present suit, either as plaintiff or defendant. The complaint was attacked in the court below upon the ground, • .among others, that there was a defect of parties, and this point is vigorously pressed in this court.

The general rule unquestionably is, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunderlock v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Burns v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Douglay v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Sloan v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Barnes v. WagenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State Fair Ass'n v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Bosstick v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API