Concannon v. Noble
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Laporte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
An action was brought by the appellee against the appellants and George Sykes, and a judgment was rendered against all of the defendants in that action. The ■complaint in the present case seeks a review of that judgment, and the suit is prosecuted by the appellants alone. Their co-defendant in the former action is not made a party .to the present suit, either as plaintiff or defendant. The complaint was attacked in the court below upon the ground, • .among others, that there was a defect of parties, and this point is vigorously pressed in this court.
The general rule unquestionably is, that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hunderlock v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Burns v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Douglay v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Sloan v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Barnes v. WagenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State Fair Ass'n v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Bosstick v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933