Legal Opinion

Tate v. Hamlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1895No. 17,611PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

A special appearance has been entered in this cause by the appellees for the sole purpose of making a motion by them to dismiss this appeal. The reasons assigned in the motion are: (1) That this court is without jurisdiction of the appellees; (2) said appeal was taken without filing a bond, and without notice to these appellees; (3) no notice of appeal was ever issued to or served by any officer of this court, nor was any return of service of notice of appeal ever made to this court by a person authorized by law to make returns to this court.

The appeal, it is conceded, is not a term time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Harshman v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Wright v. MannsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Johnson v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Coxe Bros. & Co. v. FoleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Neff v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. TOURKOW, ADMR. v. HooverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API