Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. McNaul
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 14, 2011No. 08-1159-JTMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge.
The matter before the court involves an issue of first impression in this District— whether a law firm may independently assert work product protection when the client has waived such protection. As a corollary, the court must also decide whether to adopt the “entire file approach” or “end product approach” when determining the extent to which Baker & McKenzie (Firm) must produce privileged or work product documents to the Receiver.
This issue comes to this court on review of Magistrate Judge Donald W. Bostwick’s Memorandum and Order (Dkt.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thai Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic RepublicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Tempay, Inc. v. Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. CarnesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.