Fried v. Sungard Recovery Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
All Defendants; SunGard Recovery Services Inc., SunGard Data Systems, Inc., James DiBrino, Michael Mulholland (jointly, the SunGard Defendants) and Intech Construction, Inc., move this Court for a Summary Judgment on Count II of Plaintiffs’ Second Complaint. This is the only count common to all Defendants and the only count remaining against the SunGard Defendants.
This Court will grant a summary judgment if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show there is no genuine issue of material…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Midwest Suspension and BrakeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. American Electric Power Service Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Don't Waste Arizona, Inc. v. McLane Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1997
- San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- United States v. LTV Steel Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Facts v. City of St. Louis, Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.