Legal Opinion

San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. Moore

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 22, 2001No. CIV.S00-0334-WBS/DADPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHUBB, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. (“Baykeeper”), also known as Waterkeep-ers Northern California, sues defendant California Department of Boating and Waterways (“DBW”) pursuant to the citizen’s enforcement provision of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the “Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. § 1365. Plaintiffs move for summary judgment.

I. Factual Background

Baykeeper is a nonprofit corporation dedicated to the protection of the San Francisco Bay and Delta. Plaintiff Bill Jennings represents a Baykeeper project…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Diablo Grande, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
  2. Swartz v. BeachDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
  3. Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
  4. CA Open Lands v. Butte County Dept. of Public WorksDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API