Legal Opinion
United States v. John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 2004No. 03-10186PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
John Doe challenges a restitution order entered against him on the ground that the government did not prove that the restitution amounts imposed reflected the losses of identified victims. He appeals from an amended judgment of conviction entered after a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) resentencing. We hold that we may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal under both 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and remand to the District Court for resentencing.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Doe was indicted for securities fraud and other offenses in the District of Nevada, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Rodolfo Espinoza Abarca, United States of America v. Espinoza Rodolfo AbarcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ball v. McDowellTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. James Montgomery, United States of America v. Mary O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Stephen Robert GunningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.