Legal Opinion
Diedrich v. City of Ketchikan
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1991No. S-3568, S-3659PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
Peter Diedrich was employed as a utilities engineer with Ketchikan Public Utilities (“City”). On September 22,1986, Died-rich was asked to resign and refused to do so. On September 26, 1986, the City terminated Diedrich. Diedrich then appealed his termination to the City Personnel Board (“Board”). After the Board expressed concern about the lack of a prior written warning regarding Diedrich’s unsatisfactory job performance, the City’s notice of termination was rescinded. Diedrich returned to work on approximately December 26, 1986.
Five days after the Board began hearing…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.