Legal Opinion

Clark v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1937No. 26829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county. The action was instituted by Hartford Fire Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Arthur Burkett, J. Paul Tedford, and C. S. Clark, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to enforce liability on an insurance agent’s fidelity bond. Arthur Burkett and J. Paul Tedford permitted judgment to go against them by default. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant C. S. Clark, and he appeals. The propriety of the directed verdict is the sole question presented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Stuart v. First National Bank of ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Clark v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Surety Co. of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API