Legal Opinion

Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1935No. 25566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

There is involved here the question of liability of Oles I. Clouse, surety on the insurance agency bond of Tom Douglas.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated the insurance company, secured a judgment below in the sum of $367.60, interest, attorney fees, and costs, based on an instructed verdict against Tom Douglas, principal on the bond forming the basis of this action.

A judgment based on an instructed verdict was rendered favorable to Oles I. Clouse, surety on tbe insurance agency bond of Tom Douglas. From tbe latter judgment tbe insurance company appeals. Tbe liability of tbe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vogel Bros. & Co. v. BastinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Star Insurance Co. of America v. CareySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Capps v. Insurance Company of N. A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Clark v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. KernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. National Casualty Co. v. SipesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API