Clark v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county. The action was instituted by Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, defendant in error here, against Arthur Burkett and C. S. Clark, plaintiff in error here, to enforce liability on a fide'ity bond. We will hereafter refer to the parties in the order of their appearances in the tri'al court. There is no, material dispute regarding the facts. On October 23, 1930, Arthur Burkett, as principal, and C. S. Cl'ark, as surety, exo-cntod and delivered to the plaintiff a bond conditioned upon the faithful discharge by said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Screwmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. JenningsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Johnson v. State Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Phoenix Ins. Co. of Hartford v. NewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Vogel Bros. & Co. v. BastinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937