Holitza v. City of Kansas
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Wyandotte district court; E. L. Fischer, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, C. J. :
Frank Holitza and his wife were injured by reason of an unprotected excavation in one of the much-traveled streets in Kansas City, and he brought this action to. recover the damages so sustained. After the plaintiff's testimony was received, the court, on a demurrer, held the evidence to be insufficient to establish a cause of action, the insuffi-ciencybeing the lack of notice to the city of the defect in the street. The case comes to us on a record wherein the following facts are recited :
“There was no evidence to show that the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Blankenship v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Draper v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Hack v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Kellett v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.