Legal Opinion

Holitza v. City of Kansas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1903No. 13,379PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Wyandotte district court; E. L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, C. J. :

Frank Holitza and his wife were injured by reason of an unprotected excavation in one of the much-traveled streets in Kansas City, and he brought this action to. recover the damages so sustained. After the plaintiff's testimony was received, the court, on a demurrer, held the evidence to be insufficient to establish a cause of action, the insuffi-ciencybeing the lack of notice to the city of the defect in the street. The case comes to us on a record wherein the following facts are recited :

“There was no evidence to show that the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Blankenship v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Draper v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hack v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Kellett v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API