Hack v. City of Pittsburg
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal asking for a new trial on the amount of damages.
The damages claimed are the result of plaintiff’s stumbling and falling on account of a hole in that portion of a city street ordinarily used for vehicular traffic. The street in question led to an outlying portion of the city. It was' not'paved but was made of cinders, well packed and hard. There were no sidewalks on this street at the point where the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fenn v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Foley v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Durkin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Holitza v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Register v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- City of Okmulgee v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Loftin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Lukens v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Dargatz v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.