Legal Opinion

Kellett v. City & County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1940No. 2398PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff had judgment below and the defendant prosecuted exceptions.

The question of the sufficiency of the defendant’s exceptions was raised, the plaintiff contending that they were not sufficiently specific, to warrant review. Without indulging in details, we deem them sufficient to present for review the contentions of the defendant that it did not appear from the evidence that the negligence of the defendant, if any, was the direct and proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries and that the evidence was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Kirk v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Harriman v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. City of Rome v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Levy v. KimballHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gump v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Harris v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Hascup v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Chambers v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API