Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1943No. 35,675PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*608The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff from a fall on a sidewalk of the city alleged to have resulted from a hole in the sidewalk which defendant negligently had permitted to remain there. The jury answered special questions and returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,500, on which judgment was rendered. Defendant has appealed.

The facts, concerning which there is no dispute, may be stated as follows: Orville avenue is a paved east-and-west street of Kansas City and is intersected by Tenth street. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Evans v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Pierce v. JilkaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Gilmore v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Snyder v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Loftin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API