Blankenship v. City of Kansas City
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*608The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This was an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff from a fall on a sidewalk of the city alleged to have resulted from a hole in the sidewalk which defendant negligently had permitted to remain there. The jury answered special questions and returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,500, on which judgment was rendered. Defendant has appealed.
The facts, concerning which there is no dispute, may be stated as follows: Orville avenue is a paved east-and-west street of Kansas City and is intersected by Tenth street. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Evans v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Pierce v. JilkaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Gilmore v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Snyder v. City of ConcordiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Loftin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.