Legal Opinion

Noll v. Carlson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1987No. 85-6235PublishedCited by 868 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

William Noll, a federal prisoner, brought a Bivens -type1 civil rights action pro se and in forma pauperis against four officials of the United States Bureau of Prisons. After Noll twice amended his complaint at his own instance, the district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim.2 In dismissing the action, the court did not advise Noll in what respects his second amended complaint was deficient, nor did the court allow Noll leave to amend.3 We review de novo the dismissal of the action. Rizzo v. Dawson, 778 F.2d 527, 530 (9th Cir.1985).

The question…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by868 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Robert M. Schucker v. Terry G. Rockwood James C. Fukuhara Dewar, Romig & Rockwood, Inc. Anne D. McGowan Delay, Laredo & McGowan Maurice JourdaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

863 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API