Legal Opinion
Robert M. Schucker v. Terry G. Rockwood James C. Fukuhara Dewar, Romig & Rockwood, Inc. Anne D. McGowan Delay, Laredo & McGowan Maurice Jourdane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1988No. 86-2900PublishedCited by 597 opinions
1Per curiam
Schucker appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Schucker alleged that he had been deprived of his liberty and property without due process of law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We review a dismissal of an action de novo. Whittington v. Whittington, 733 F.2d 620, 621 (9th Cir.1984). Dismissal of a pro se complaint without leave to amend is proper only if it is “ ‘absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.’ ” Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir.1987), quoting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by597 opinions
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Scott Nordstrom v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Philip Rosati v. Dr. IgbinosoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Silva v. Di VittorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Moore v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
592 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.