Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Holding v. Nesbitt

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1966No. Civ. No. 66-144PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANKS, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, a resident and citizen of Oklahoma City and operator of a news stand *695therein, brought this action for a judgment declaring the Oklahoma Statutes creating the Oklahoma Literature Commission (21 O.S. §§ 1040.1 to 1040.7)( to be violative of the Constitution of the United States and for an injunction prohibiting defendants from acting under or enforcing those statutes. Principal defendants are Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, Dr. Oliver Hodge, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and Buck Cook, Commissioner of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Henley v. WiseDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
  3. Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. FieldDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Henley v. WiseDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
  5. United Artists Corporation v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API