Legal Opinion
Henley v. Wise
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 4, 1969No. Civ. No. 69 H 28PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
303 F.Supp. 62 (1969)
Mary HENLEY et al.
v.
George WISE et al.
Civ. No. 69 H 28.
United States District Court N. D. Indiana, Hammond Division.
June 4, 1969.
Saul I. Ruman, Hammond, Ind., Burton D. Wechsler, Gary, Ind., for plaintiffs.
Richard F. James, Hammond, Ind., Alfred R. Uzis, Lowell, Ind., for defendants.
Before KERNER, Circuit Judge, GRANT, Chief District Judge, and BEAMER, District Judge.
OPINION
BEAMER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Mary Henley is the operator of the Village Boutique in Hammond, Indiana. Plaintiff Robert Adams is an employee in the same establishment. The remaining plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barbone v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Scherr v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kois v. BreierDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- United States v. B & H DIST. CORP.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1974
- People v. LurosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.